<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have You Ever Gotten Shavings From a File?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/index.php/2010/03/01/have-you-ever-gotten-shavings-from-a-file/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/03/01/have-you-ever-gotten-shavings-from-a-file/</link>
	<description>So many projects, so little time...  Welcome to Woodworking A-D-D.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:30:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/03/01/have-you-ever-gotten-shavings-from-a-file/comment-page-1/#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/?p=503#comment-4886</guid>
		<description>Bob, I can see your point and I have only tried it on hard hardwoods like Maple and Ash.  I&#039;ll give it a go on Mahogany, Poplar and Pine and see what I think.  I do think that these are much more aggressive than your average rasp.  The med cut leaves a rougher surface than a Nicholson #49.  I would like to try the fine and extra fine cuts to see how they work.  The more I play with it the smoother it gets so I second your thoughts on the &quot;break in&quot; period.  Also they are not as intuitive to use as a rasp.  There is an optimum angle of attack to get the best results whereas a rasp can work however you push it.  No question that further experimentation is needed and I&#039;ll let you know what I discover as I keep working with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I can see your point and I have only tried it on hard hardwoods like Maple and Ash.  I&#8217;ll give it a go on Mahogany, Poplar and Pine and see what I think.  I do think that these are much more aggressive than your average rasp.  The med cut leaves a rougher surface than a Nicholson #49.  I would like to try the fine and extra fine cuts to see how they work.  The more I play with it the smoother it gets so I second your thoughts on the &#8220;break in&#8221; period.  Also they are not as intuitive to use as a rasp.  There is an optimum angle of attack to get the best results whereas a rasp can work however you push it.  No question that further experimentation is needed and I&#8217;ll let you know what I discover as I keep working with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Rozaieski</title>
		<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/03/01/have-you-ever-gotten-shavings-from-a-file/comment-page-1/#comment-4883</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Rozaieski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/?p=503#comment-4883</guid>
		<description>You know, I tried one of these at Lee Richmond&#039;s booth (The Best Things) at WIA in Valley Forge last year and I was not that impressed with them. They seemed very grabby on less dense woods like mahogany. Not nearly as smooth as a patternmaker&#039;s rasp, and not nearly as nice of a finish (those cuts on that maple in your pic are much deeper than what I typically get from my #50).  Of course it could have just been me (I have heard that they have a break in period and a learning curve). Have you tried it on anything but the hard maple?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I tried one of these at Lee Richmond&#8217;s booth (The Best Things) at WIA in Valley Forge last year and I was not that impressed with them. They seemed very grabby on less dense woods like mahogany. Not nearly as smooth as a patternmaker&#8217;s rasp, and not nearly as nice of a finish (those cuts on that maple in your pic are much deeper than what I typically get from my #50).  Of course it could have just been me (I have heard that they have a break in period and a learning curve). Have you tried it on anything but the hard maple?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/03/01/have-you-ever-gotten-shavings-from-a-file/comment-page-1/#comment-4870</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/?p=503#comment-4870</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting question that I don&#039;t think can be answered until I have more time to apply this tool to an actual project.  I often use the tapered point of a rasp to get into tight areas.  These files are not tapered.  A typical rasp cuts in any orientation where these files seems to cut best in a narrow range of orientation like a plane blade.  So they may not be as flexible as a rasp but I can see them coming very close to replacing a rasp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting question that I don&#8217;t think can be answered until I have more time to apply this tool to an actual project.  I often use the tapered point of a rasp to get into tight areas.  These files are not tapered.  A typical rasp cuts in any orientation where these files seems to cut best in a narrow range of orientation like a plane blade.  So they may not be as flexible as a rasp but I can see them coming very close to replacing a rasp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Marshall</title>
		<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/03/01/have-you-ever-gotten-shavings-from-a-file/comment-page-1/#comment-4869</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/?p=503#comment-4869</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your insights on these carving files.  In your view are these tools for follow-up from rasp shaping or a substitute for it?

Cheers --- Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insights on these carving files.  In your view are these tools for follow-up from rasp shaping or a substitute for it?</p>
<p>Cheers &#8212; Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewoodshopbug</title>
		<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/03/01/have-you-ever-gotten-shavings-from-a-file/comment-page-1/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>thewoodshopbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/?p=503#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>I just got the small (3/8&quot; x 4&quot;) flat float from Iwasaki and have been really really impressed.  I&#039;ve been using it to build a coffin smoother, and the surfaces it leaves almost need no sanding.  It looks like the float I have is not as coarse as yours, but I&#039;m hooked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got the small (3/8&#8243; x 4&#8243;) flat float from Iwasaki and have been really really impressed.  I&#8217;ve been using it to build a coffin smoother, and the surfaces it leaves almost need no sanding.  It looks like the float I have is not as coarse as yours, but I&#8217;m hooked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.565 seconds -->

